Artwork

Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Ứng dụng Podcast
Chuyển sang chế độ ngoại tuyến với ứng dụng Player FM !

BldgAltEntf E036: "KlemmbauOER"

1:59:10
 
Chia sẻ
 

Series đã xóa ("Feed không hoạt động" status)

When? This feed was archived on April 06, 2022 03:53 (2y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 01, 2021 23:09 (2+ y ago)

Why? Feed không hoạt động status. Server của chúng tôi không thể lấy được feed hoạt động của podcast trong một khoảng thời gian.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 287200894 series 2421685
Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

Die Folge haben wir am 11.03.2021 aufgenommen.

Intro

Hört auf alle Fälle weiter, wir reden doch noch etwas weiter, … wir haben es halt nicht so mit Regeln.

News+Alt+Entf

News+O

News+A

Paper+Alt+Entf

Paper+O: Hey, du, willst du ein Paper kaufen?

Crook, Charles; Nixon, Elizabeth

How internet essay mill websites portray the student experience of higher education Artikel

In: The Internet and Higher Education, 48 , S. 100775, 2020, ISSN: 1096-7516.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Crook2020,
title = {How internet essay mill websites portray the student experience of higher education},
author = {Charles Crook and Elizabeth Nixon},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100775
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300518},
doi = {10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100775},
issn = {1096-7516},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-10-17},
journal = {The Internet and Higher Education},
volume = {48},
pages = {100775},
abstract = {Higher education is under mounting pressure to confront student practices of assignment outsourcing to internet services. The scale and buoyancy of this ‘essay mill’ industry has now been well documented, including its various marketing techniques for urging students to purchase bespoke academic work. However, the inherently suspect nature of such services demands that they adopt a particularly shrewd and empathic rhetoric to win custom from website visitors. In this paper, we investigate how such rhetoric currently constructs a critical version of the student's higher education experience. We present a thematic analysis of promotional text and images as found on a large sample of essay mill sites. Findings reveal how these sites promulgate a hostile and negative attitude towards higher educational practice. Yet these findings may also indicate where the higher education sector needs to reflect on its practice, not least in order to resist the toxic messages of essay mills.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Schließen

Higher education is under mounting pressure to confront student practices of assignment outsourcing to internet services. The scale and buoyancy of this ‘essay mill’ industry has now been well documented, including its various marketing techniques for urging students to purchase bespoke academic work. However, the inherently suspect nature of such services demands that they adopt a particularly shrewd and empathic rhetoric to win custom from website visitors. In this paper, we investigate how such rhetoric currently constructs a critical version of the student's higher education experience. We present a thematic analysis of promotional text and images as found on a large sample of essay mill sites. Findings reveal how these sites promulgate a hostile and negative attitude towards higher educational practice. Yet these findings may also indicate where the higher education sector needs to reflect on its practice, not least in order to resist the toxic messages of essay mills.

Schließen

Wie werben eigentlich Ghostwriter:innen um ihre Kundschaft, die sich dann Aufsätze schreiben lässt und als die eigenen ausgibt? Und was kann man vielleicht als Hochschule dagegen tun? Das wollten Crook/Nixon wissen …

Paper+A: Mal mal!

Cromley, Jennifer G.; Du, Yang; Dane, Aygul Parpucu

Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing? Artikel

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29 , S. 216–229, 2019.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Cromley2019,
title = {Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing?},
author = {Jennifer G. Cromley and Yang Du and Aygul Parpucu Dane},
editor = {Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing?},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09807-6},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-019-09807-6},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-21},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {29},
pages = {216–229},
abstract = {Drawing-to-learn is a specific learning/reading strategy studied across many domains. In response to gaps in our knowledge about drawing-to-learn, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis of the literature published since the influential 2005 Van Meter and Garner literature review. We analyzed the benefits of directed learner-generated visual representations such as sketching, drawing, or computer-assisted creation of a full or partial static image. Forty-one peer-reviewed articles were screened in, together with 9 dissertations and 2 other documents; published from 2005 to 2018, these included 53 studies and 166 effects based on 8111 participants. The overall effect of drawing-to-learn across all dependent variable types (factual, inferential, and transfer) and both types of effects—comparing different types of drawing and comparing drawing to non-drawing conditions—was a significant g = 0.69. The overall effect was significant but differed across outcomes (g = 0.85 for factual, g = 0.44 for inferential, and g = 0.22 for transfer). Analyses across 6 moderators are presented. Not only does the literature continue to show that drawing-to-learn is better than the status quo, but directed drawing improves factual as well as inferential and transfer learning. Finally, researchers have found ways to improve drawing-to-learn instruction so that it can be even more effective than the simple directive to make a drawing.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Schließen

Drawing-to-learn is a specific learning/reading strategy studied across many domains. In response to gaps in our knowledge about drawing-to-learn, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis of the literature published since the influential 2005 Van Meter and Garner literature review. We analyzed the benefits of directed learner-generated visual representations such as sketching, drawing, or computer-assisted creation of a full or partial static image. Forty-one peer-reviewed articles were screened in, together with 9 dissertations and 2 other documents; published from 2005 to 2018, these included 53 studies and 166 effects based on 8111 participants. The overall effect of drawing-to-learn across all dependent variable types (factual, inferential, and transfer) and both types of effects—comparing different types of drawing and comparing drawing to non-drawing conditions—was a significant g = 0.69. The overall effect was significant but differed across outcomes (g = 0.85 for factual, g = 0.44 for inferential, and g = 0.22 for transfer). Analyses across 6 moderators are presented. Not only does the literature continue to show that drawing-to-learn is better than the status quo, but directed drawing improves factual as well as inferential and transfer learning. Finally, researchers have found ways to improve drawing-to-learn instruction so that it can be even more effective than the simple directive to make a drawing.

Schließen

Zeichnen als Lernstrategie klingt nach einer guten Idee: Man muss sich dabei aktiv mit den Inhalten auseinandersetzen und bringt sie zudem in eine visuelle Form. Ob sich das auch empirisch bestätigt, haben die Autor:innen in einem Literaturreview zusammengetragen.

Fundgrube+Alt+Entf

Projekte, Tools, Apps… das sind doch bürgerliche Kategorien. Wir packen einfach alles in die Fundgrube:

Politik+Alt+Entf

Veranstaltungstipps

  • 15. bis 19. März 2021: Actionbound Bound-Design-Festival
    Die bekannte Schnitzeljagd-App hat ein buntes Programm mit Talks, Workshops und mehr (aber es ist schon einiges ausgebucht)
  • 02. bis 05. April 2021: DiVOC Reboot to Respawn (online)
    Zum Oster-Event des Chaos Computer Clubs kann man schon Maps, Sessions, Lightningtalks und mehr einreichen.
  • 18. Mai 2021: Hochschulbarcamp
    Das BarCamp rund um Hochschulthemen sollte letztes Jahr bereits mit A und O stattfinden, nun ist es wie alle Veranstaltungen auch online und es gibt schon Tickets.

Weltverbesserung+Alt+Entf

Brick4theKids will Klemmbausteine an Kinderheime verschenken. Dafür kann man hier spenden. Warum „Klemmbausteine“ sagen das neue Gendern ist, erfahrt Ihr hier.

Diese und andere Weltverbesserungsideen findet man auch gesammelt hier.

  continue reading

Chương

1. Kampfansage (00:00:00)

2. Rundenplan (00:01:44)

3. Neues von O: Ancestry (00:02:20)

4. Neues von O: Buchvorstellung OER-Standards (00:07:12)

5. Neues von A: Kurse bauen (00:12:19)

6. Neues von A: EMOOCs-Reviews einholen (00:14:22)

7. Neues von A: Probevortrag anhören (00:15:07)

8. Neues von A: ikk nerven (00:17:37)

9. Neues von A: Bodo Wartke verpassen (00:19:28)

10. Neues von A: Regal fertig bauen (00:19:49)

11. Neues von A: Schreibtisch verstellen (00:21:50)

12. Paper #1: Hey, du! Willst du ein Paper kaufen? (00:24:46)

13. Paper #2: Mal mal! (00:52:35)

14. Fundgrube: Selbstlernmaterialien gestalten (01:18:10)

15. Fundgrube: Freie Software-Dienste mit Katzen (01:19:40)

16. Fundgrube: Oh my git (01:21:25)

17. Fundgrube: Copy and Paste OER-Tool (01:25:20)

18. Fundgrube: Wikimedia Commons App (01:27:35)

19. Politik: BildungDigital (01:30:25)

20. Politik: OER-Strategie-Prozess (01:38:25)

21. Veranstaltungstipps (01:48:17)

22. Weltverbesserungsidee (01:52:38)

23. Schlussgong (01:56:15)

43 tập

Artwork

BldgAltEntf E036: "KlemmbauOER"

Bildung-Alt-Entfernen

14 subscribers

published

iconChia sẻ
 

Series đã xóa ("Feed không hoạt động" status)

When? This feed was archived on April 06, 2022 03:53 (2y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 01, 2021 23:09 (2+ y ago)

Why? Feed không hoạt động status. Server của chúng tôi không thể lấy được feed hoạt động của podcast trong một khoảng thời gian.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 287200894 series 2421685
Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Bldg-Alt-Entf, Anja Lorenz, and Oliver Tacke hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

Die Folge haben wir am 11.03.2021 aufgenommen.

Intro

Hört auf alle Fälle weiter, wir reden doch noch etwas weiter, … wir haben es halt nicht so mit Regeln.

News+Alt+Entf

News+O

News+A

Paper+Alt+Entf

Paper+O: Hey, du, willst du ein Paper kaufen?

Crook, Charles; Nixon, Elizabeth

How internet essay mill websites portray the student experience of higher education Artikel

In: The Internet and Higher Education, 48 , S. 100775, 2020, ISSN: 1096-7516.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Crook2020,
title = {How internet essay mill websites portray the student experience of higher education},
author = {Charles Crook and Elizabeth Nixon},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100775
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300518},
doi = {10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100775},
issn = {1096-7516},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-10-17},
journal = {The Internet and Higher Education},
volume = {48},
pages = {100775},
abstract = {Higher education is under mounting pressure to confront student practices of assignment outsourcing to internet services. The scale and buoyancy of this ‘essay mill’ industry has now been well documented, including its various marketing techniques for urging students to purchase bespoke academic work. However, the inherently suspect nature of such services demands that they adopt a particularly shrewd and empathic rhetoric to win custom from website visitors. In this paper, we investigate how such rhetoric currently constructs a critical version of the student's higher education experience. We present a thematic analysis of promotional text and images as found on a large sample of essay mill sites. Findings reveal how these sites promulgate a hostile and negative attitude towards higher educational practice. Yet these findings may also indicate where the higher education sector needs to reflect on its practice, not least in order to resist the toxic messages of essay mills.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Schließen

Higher education is under mounting pressure to confront student practices of assignment outsourcing to internet services. The scale and buoyancy of this ‘essay mill’ industry has now been well documented, including its various marketing techniques for urging students to purchase bespoke academic work. However, the inherently suspect nature of such services demands that they adopt a particularly shrewd and empathic rhetoric to win custom from website visitors. In this paper, we investigate how such rhetoric currently constructs a critical version of the student's higher education experience. We present a thematic analysis of promotional text and images as found on a large sample of essay mill sites. Findings reveal how these sites promulgate a hostile and negative attitude towards higher educational practice. Yet these findings may also indicate where the higher education sector needs to reflect on its practice, not least in order to resist the toxic messages of essay mills.

Schließen

Wie werben eigentlich Ghostwriter:innen um ihre Kundschaft, die sich dann Aufsätze schreiben lässt und als die eigenen ausgibt? Und was kann man vielleicht als Hochschule dagegen tun? Das wollten Crook/Nixon wissen …

Paper+A: Mal mal!

Cromley, Jennifer G.; Du, Yang; Dane, Aygul Parpucu

Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing? Artikel

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29 , S. 216–229, 2019.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Cromley2019,
title = {Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing?},
author = {Jennifer G. Cromley and Yang Du and Aygul Parpucu Dane},
editor = {Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing?},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09807-6},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-019-09807-6},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-21},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {29},
pages = {216–229},
abstract = {Drawing-to-learn is a specific learning/reading strategy studied across many domains. In response to gaps in our knowledge about drawing-to-learn, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis of the literature published since the influential 2005 Van Meter and Garner literature review. We analyzed the benefits of directed learner-generated visual representations such as sketching, drawing, or computer-assisted creation of a full or partial static image. Forty-one peer-reviewed articles were screened in, together with 9 dissertations and 2 other documents; published from 2005 to 2018, these included 53 studies and 166 effects based on 8111 participants. The overall effect of drawing-to-learn across all dependent variable types (factual, inferential, and transfer) and both types of effects—comparing different types of drawing and comparing drawing to non-drawing conditions—was a significant g = 0.69. The overall effect was significant but differed across outcomes (g = 0.85 for factual, g = 0.44 for inferential, and g = 0.22 for transfer). Analyses across 6 moderators are presented. Not only does the literature continue to show that drawing-to-learn is better than the status quo, but directed drawing improves factual as well as inferential and transfer learning. Finally, researchers have found ways to improve drawing-to-learn instruction so that it can be even more effective than the simple directive to make a drawing.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Schließen

Drawing-to-learn is a specific learning/reading strategy studied across many domains. In response to gaps in our knowledge about drawing-to-learn, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis of the literature published since the influential 2005 Van Meter and Garner literature review. We analyzed the benefits of directed learner-generated visual representations such as sketching, drawing, or computer-assisted creation of a full or partial static image. Forty-one peer-reviewed articles were screened in, together with 9 dissertations and 2 other documents; published from 2005 to 2018, these included 53 studies and 166 effects based on 8111 participants. The overall effect of drawing-to-learn across all dependent variable types (factual, inferential, and transfer) and both types of effects—comparing different types of drawing and comparing drawing to non-drawing conditions—was a significant g = 0.69. The overall effect was significant but differed across outcomes (g = 0.85 for factual, g = 0.44 for inferential, and g = 0.22 for transfer). Analyses across 6 moderators are presented. Not only does the literature continue to show that drawing-to-learn is better than the status quo, but directed drawing improves factual as well as inferential and transfer learning. Finally, researchers have found ways to improve drawing-to-learn instruction so that it can be even more effective than the simple directive to make a drawing.

Schließen

Zeichnen als Lernstrategie klingt nach einer guten Idee: Man muss sich dabei aktiv mit den Inhalten auseinandersetzen und bringt sie zudem in eine visuelle Form. Ob sich das auch empirisch bestätigt, haben die Autor:innen in einem Literaturreview zusammengetragen.

Fundgrube+Alt+Entf

Projekte, Tools, Apps… das sind doch bürgerliche Kategorien. Wir packen einfach alles in die Fundgrube:

Politik+Alt+Entf

Veranstaltungstipps

  • 15. bis 19. März 2021: Actionbound Bound-Design-Festival
    Die bekannte Schnitzeljagd-App hat ein buntes Programm mit Talks, Workshops und mehr (aber es ist schon einiges ausgebucht)
  • 02. bis 05. April 2021: DiVOC Reboot to Respawn (online)
    Zum Oster-Event des Chaos Computer Clubs kann man schon Maps, Sessions, Lightningtalks und mehr einreichen.
  • 18. Mai 2021: Hochschulbarcamp
    Das BarCamp rund um Hochschulthemen sollte letztes Jahr bereits mit A und O stattfinden, nun ist es wie alle Veranstaltungen auch online und es gibt schon Tickets.

Weltverbesserung+Alt+Entf

Brick4theKids will Klemmbausteine an Kinderheime verschenken. Dafür kann man hier spenden. Warum „Klemmbausteine“ sagen das neue Gendern ist, erfahrt Ihr hier.

Diese und andere Weltverbesserungsideen findet man auch gesammelt hier.

  continue reading

Chương

1. Kampfansage (00:00:00)

2. Rundenplan (00:01:44)

3. Neues von O: Ancestry (00:02:20)

4. Neues von O: Buchvorstellung OER-Standards (00:07:12)

5. Neues von A: Kurse bauen (00:12:19)

6. Neues von A: EMOOCs-Reviews einholen (00:14:22)

7. Neues von A: Probevortrag anhören (00:15:07)

8. Neues von A: ikk nerven (00:17:37)

9. Neues von A: Bodo Wartke verpassen (00:19:28)

10. Neues von A: Regal fertig bauen (00:19:49)

11. Neues von A: Schreibtisch verstellen (00:21:50)

12. Paper #1: Hey, du! Willst du ein Paper kaufen? (00:24:46)

13. Paper #2: Mal mal! (00:52:35)

14. Fundgrube: Selbstlernmaterialien gestalten (01:18:10)

15. Fundgrube: Freie Software-Dienste mit Katzen (01:19:40)

16. Fundgrube: Oh my git (01:21:25)

17. Fundgrube: Copy and Paste OER-Tool (01:25:20)

18. Fundgrube: Wikimedia Commons App (01:27:35)

19. Politik: BildungDigital (01:30:25)

20. Politik: OER-Strategie-Prozess (01:38:25)

21. Veranstaltungstipps (01:48:17)

22. Weltverbesserungsidee (01:52:38)

23. Schlussgong (01:56:15)

43 tập

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Chào mừng bạn đến với Player FM!

Player FM đang quét trang web để tìm các podcast chất lượng cao cho bạn thưởng thức ngay bây giờ. Đây là ứng dụng podcast tốt nhất và hoạt động trên Android, iPhone và web. Đăng ký để đồng bộ các theo dõi trên tất cả thiết bị.

 

Hướng dẫn sử dụng nhanh