In each episode of Not Reserving Judgment, Canadian Constitution Foundation Executive Director Joanna Baron, Litigation Director Christine Van Geyn, and Counsel Josh Dehaas walk you though the latest Canadian constitutional law headlines, update you on our litigation, and share our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.
…
continue reading

1
Episode 60: Adamson BBQ sentencing, MAID concerns & crazy climate change challenge
50:40
50:40
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
50:40
On Episode 60, we discuss the sentencing William Adamson Skelly, who was convicted for operating a BBQ business without a license during COVID-19; we explain the constitutional challenge to Ontario's climate targets; and we discuss chilling new details about MAID. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Toronto (City) v. Adamson Barbecu…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 59: HILARIOUS update in Jordan Peterson's free speech fight. Plus why Samidoun was listed.
29:55
29:55
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
29:55
On Episode 59, we give you an update on Jordan Peterson's fight with the Ontario College of Psychologists, we explain why Samidoun has been listed as a terrorist entity, and we tell you about how the justice system in Windsor, Ont., appears to be failing the public. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: No jail, but Windsor judge orde…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 58: Supreme Court upholds air travel compensation. Plus free daycare for asylum seekers?
42:04
42:04
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
42:04
On Episode 58, we tell you about a Quebec decision that found it's discriminatory to not give subsidized daycare to asylum seekers, we explain a new Supreme Court ruling that upheld airline passenger compensation regulations, and Josh complains endlessly about WestJet. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: RA v. WestJet Airlines Ltd W…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 57: Criminalizing 'denialism' (!?). Plus Kaplan-Myrth loses & Medicine Hat mayor wins.
51:35
51:35
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
51:35
On Episode 57, we tell you about a win and a loss in the war against expression-limiting codes of conduct, and we explain the problems with the proposal to criminalize 'residential school denialism.' Plus Preston Manning's proposed Act Respecting Provincial Jurisdiction. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Clark v City of Medicine H…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 56: Is requiring SCC judges to be bilingual constitutional? Plus why the Canada Health Act must change
58:37
58:37
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
58:37
On Episode 56, we walk you through some potential court challenges to right the ship of federalism, explain why the Canada Health Act must change, and fill you in on the latest news about the Online Harms Act. Plus, should Lake Winnipeg be legally defined as a person? Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Bill C-13: An Act to amend th…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 55: B.C. lawyers ATTACKED for telling the truth, involuntary treatment & gender-fluid dog
31:33
31:33
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
31:33
On Episode 55, we talk about B.C.’s plan to expand involuntary treatment, we discuss the B.C. Law Society’s attack on two members for requesting that a mandatory Indigenous training course be accurate, and we tell you about a lawsuit involving a gender-fluid dog. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Social worker wins £55,000 after r…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 54: Victory (?) for free speech in Niagara and mayhem at McGill Law
37:45
37:45
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
37:45
On Episode 54, we discuss the dramatic and escalating strike situation at McGill Law and a partial victory for free expression following an unconstitutional Niagara Region City Council decision. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Threat of constitutional challenge leads Niagara Regional Council to change sign and prop bans McGill l…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 53: Free speech fears as Durov DETAINED & magic mushrooms outrage
30:45
30:45
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
30:45
On Episode 53, we explain why freedom of speech advocates are concerned about France's arrest of Telegram founder Pavel Durov; we discuss whether magic mushrooms should be legal; and Josh calls b.s. on a self-identified bisexual asylum seeker who wants 'status for all.' Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: After Canada cancelled his …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 52: COVID class actions, U.K. speech crimes & MAID for the mentally ill
56:21
56:21
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
56:21
On Episode 52, we explain the proposed class actions related to COVID-19 vaccines and lockdowns in Alberta; we discuss the new legal challenge that argues the mentally ill have a right to MAID; and we update you on the harsh sentences for speech crimes in the U.K. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short survey!* Stor…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 51: Big LOSS for Jordan Peterson. Big WIN for privacy rights. Plus Dattani steps down.
1:00:06
1:00:06
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:00:06
On Episode 51, we update you on Jordan Peterson's fight for freedom of expression; we tell you why the new commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission stepped down; and we walk you through a decision on when phones & laptops can be searched at the border. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short survey!* Stor…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 50: When can cops arrest protesters? Farmer faces $400K fee. Plus Coutts trial ends.
53:15
53:15
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
53:15
On Episode 50, we explain why Toronto Police might have violated a man's rights by arresting him for breach of the peace at an anti-Israel protest; we tell you about an Ontario man facing $400,000 in archeological fees; and we update you on the criminal trial of two men in Coutts. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this sh…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 49: Huge win for Ontario first nations; Niagara sign ban & interprovincial trade
44:13
44:13
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
44:13
On Episode 49, we explain a new Supreme Court treaty decision that could cost tens of billions; we chastise Niagara Regional Council for banning signs from council meetings; and we walk through a new report that says inter-provincial trade barriers cost $200 billion per year. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short s…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 48: A win against absolute government immunity & a loss on firearms
27:00
27:00
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
27:00
On Episode 48, we tell you about the Supreme Court's decision that legislatures don't have full immunity from damages when they pass clearly unconstitutional laws; and we explain why the Court rejected our intervention in a case about who decides which firearms are prohibited. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 47: Vaccine safety decision, B.C. woman's cancer hell & Sask wins (for now)
47:56
47:56
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
47:56
On Episode 47, we tell you about a B.C. woman forced to go to the U.S. for cancer care; we discuss a decision that says judges can’t just assume vaccines are safe and effective; and we tell you about a win by Saskatchewan in their fight against Trudeau's carbon tax. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short survey!* St…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 46: Brewing constitutional crisis, gardens as expression & Jamal recuses
50:23
50:23
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
50:23
On Episode 46, we discuss whether the right to freedom of expression protects naturalized gardens, we explain why Justice Jamal recused himself from the challenge to Quebec's secularism law; and we update you on the brewing constitutional crisis involving the Senate. *Are you a regular listener? Give us feedback by filling out this short survey!* S…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 45: When can cops enter your driveway? Plus U of T wins & Quesnel mayor pushes back
52:03
52:03
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
52:03
On Episode 45, we tell you about a case that will force the Supreme Court to grapple with the when police can go onto a person’s driveway without violating rights; we get into the controversy over the mayor in Quesnel, B.C.; and we walk you through the U of T injunction decision. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Asleep at the Whe…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 44: Shocking posts from Trudeau-appointee charged with policing YOUR speech
39:33
39:33
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
39:33
On Episode 44, we tell you about a family suing a Catholic hospital in Vancouver because it wouldn't perform MAID on site; we discuss how the new 'green-washing' law harms free expression; and we explain the controversy over the new federal human rights commissioner. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Government Appoints New Chief …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 43: U of T asks judge to end to pro-Palestinian encampment. Will they win?
1:00:29
1:00:29
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:00:29
On Episode 43, we give a full recap of the hearing at which the University of Toronto requested an injunction to have the People's Circle for Palestine encampment removed. We dig into whether the issues including whether the Charter applies, freedom of speech and trespass. Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 42: Is TMU law a 'clown school'? Plus new details on Trudeau's Internet regulation laws
1:00:33
1:00:33
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:00:33
On Episode 42, we dig into the new details about how the government plans to regulate your expression through the Online News Act, the Online Streaming Act and the Online Harms Act. Plus we tell you about a lawyer who got in trouble for calling TMU law a 'clown school.' Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Peter Menzies: Say goodbye …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 41: Another loss for freedom after COVID lockdown ticket upheld
51:22
51:22
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
51:22
On Episode 41, we discuss why Newfoundland is suing the federal government over equalization; we explain the debate over whether mandatory union dues violate conscience rights; and we tell you about the latest loss in the fight against COVID-19 gathering limits. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Anti-masker loses bid to have pande…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 40: Can the University of Toronto kick the anti-Israel protesters off campus?
52:58
52:58
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
52:58
On Episode 40, we discuss the University of Toronto's request for a court order to clear out the campus occupiers; we talk about whether a good Samaritan law meant to prevent overdoses protects drug dealers against drug charges; and we update you on the MPP Sarah Jama affair. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: MPP Sarah Jama’s cour…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 39: A small win and a big loss in the fight against vaccine mandates
55:13
55:13
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
55:13
On Episode 39, we discuss McGill's failed attempt to get an injunction against the protesters occupying campus; we tell you about a disappointing court ruling that upheld a B.C. vaccine mandate; and we explain why an arbitrator found Canada Post's vax mandate unreasonable. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: City surrendered to Uber…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 38: Can bylaw ban swinging? Plus what secret testimony says about Trudeau
32:42
32:42
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
32:42
On Episode 38, we discuss what formerly secret testimony about the invocation of the War Measures Act tells us about history repeating itself; we explain the court ruling that considered whether bylaw can ban swinging, and we give our Bad Legal Takes of the Week. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: We need a law against lying in pol…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 37: Why is the government paying activists to sue the government?
53:33
53:33
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
53:33
On Episode 37, we tell you about the new sabotage provision snuck into the foreign interference bill; we discuss Poilievre's proposed use of the notwithstanding clause; and we explain why we oppose the federal program that funds activists to sue the government. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: BILL C-70: An Act respecting counter…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 36: Why did a Green Party activist's protest land her in jail?
46:58
46:58
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
46:58
On Episode 36, we tell you about a challenge to Newfoundland's COVID-19 travel restrictions that's heading to the Supreme Court; we explain why a rare hate crime charge has been dropped; and we discuss why a B.C. woman's civil disobedience landed her 60 days in jail. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Fairy Creek old-growth protest…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 35: Is it OK to force drug addicts into treatment?
37:26
37:26
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
37:26
On Episode 35, Josh and Joanna discuss the possible merits and demerits of a proposed mandatory drug treatment law in New Brunswick and the pro-Hamas protests roiling U.S. college campuses and Canadian cities. Plus, they give their Bad Legal Takes of the Week. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Higgs won't rule out notwithstanding …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 34: Is it time for Governor General Mary Simon to resign?
49:05
49:05
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
49:05
On Episode 34, Josh explains why he thinks Governor General Mary Simon should resign; Christine gives you the highlights of the Canada Strong and Free Network conference including Poilievre's speech, and Joanna tells us about a Quebec law aimed at protecting politicians. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Jamie Sarkonak: Governor G…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 33: Big win for animal rights activists as parts of 'ag gag' law struck down
31:20
31:20
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
31:20
On Episode 33, we tell you about a concerning new British Columbia law that will make it easy for governments to sue companies for products that may cause harm to health; we walk you through a fascinating decision overturning a portion of an Ontario law aimed at keeping animal rights activists from filming on farms; plus we share our Bad Legal Take…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 32: Waterloo plans to expropriate farmland. Is something shady going on?
48:20
48:20
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:20
On Episode 32, we tell you about secretive plans in Waterloo Region to expropriate farmland; we explain the new Supreme Court of Canada decision that says Charter rights may sometimes yield to Indigenous rights; and we explain why declaring an emergency for a solar eclipse in Niagara Region is not only misguided but unlawful. Stories and cases disc…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 31: Was an Ontario librarian really fired for promoting viewpoint diversity?
49:16
49:16
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
49:16
On Episode 31, we tell you about the firing of an Ontario librarian whose apparent crime was trying to diversify the collection; we walk you through a heart-breaking decision by a Calgary judge to allow a woman with autism to access assisted-death over her father's objections, and we share our new polling that shows Canadians are ready for major ch…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 30: Why did a judge order activists defending 'gang-run drug camps' to pay $11,500?
37:45
37:45
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
37:45
On Episode 30, we explain why a proposed bylaw in Vaughan aimed at controlling hateful protests outside synagogues raises red flags; we explain the costs order made against an activist group defending dangerous encampments in Edmonton; plus we share our Bad Legal Takes of the Week. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Advocacy group …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 29: Were unvaxxed nurses mistreated? An arbitrator says yes.
38:24
38:24
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
38:24
On Episode 29, we tell you about a labour arbitrator decision that found a vaccine mandate that led to 10 nurses being fired from their jobs was unreasonable; we go through the Supreme Court decision that found the state needs judicial authorization to get your Internet Protocol address; and we tell you about a proposed bylaw that would ban "graphi…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 28: Why were conspiracy to murder charges dropped in Coutts?
48:09
48:09
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:09
On Episode 28, we give you an update on the criminal charges dropped against two men arrested at Coutts, Alberta in February 2022, and the civil lawsuits launched by trucker convoy participants; we explain the ruling that says Quebec's secularism law Bill 21 is fully shielded from judicial review by the notwithstanding clause; and we explain the in…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 27: Can the Trudeau government create $50,000 fines for 'harmful' speech?
48:55
48:55
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:55
On Episode 27, we do a deep dive into the new Online Harms Act, introduced this week as Bill C-63. The act would create a Digital Safety Commission, increase the penalties for criminal hate speech, allow judges to impose peace bonds on people who might commit hate speech in the future, and empower the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to fine people u…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 26: Uh oh! Online harms legislation is back. So what's in it?
54:43
54:43
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
54:43
On Episode 26, we tell you about the debate over whether the judge hearing the challenge to the Saskatchewan gender pronouns policy is allowed to make a declaration now that the notwithstanding clause has been invoked; we explain our application to intervene in the federal plastics appeal; and we tell you what we've heard about the upcoming "online…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 25: What the heck is going on at the Supreme Court of Canada?
53:37
53:37
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
53:37
On Episode 25, we explain why last week's Supreme Court decision on Indigenous child welfare preserves an important constitutional principle; we walk you through the Federal Court's feisty opinion declaring that cabinet is breaching a constitutional convention by not appointing enough judges; and we discuss our theories on why the Supreme Court is …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 24: Did Montreal Police demote an officer for a $20 donation?
52:34
52:34
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
52:34
On Episode 24, we tell you about a Montreal police officer who says he was demoted for an anonymous $20 donation to the Freedom Convoy; we explain the Supreme Court decision that found Ontario Premier Doug Ford was not required to give CBC his mandate letters; and we tell you about Supreme Court Judge Malcolm Rowe's provocative speech at the Runnym…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 23: Did Trudeau just give away Nunavut? Is B.C. about to create an Indigenous veto?
33:52
33:52
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
33:52
On Episode 23, we discuss the new Nunavut Lands and Resources Devolution Agreement and whether B.C. is planning to give First Nations a veto over certain land use decisions, and we get into the details of a concerning new cybersecurity law that could lead to secret hearings and orders to cut off Internet access without due process. Plus, Bad Legal …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 22: Why did the court smack down Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act?
48:52
48:52
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:52
On Episode 22 of Not Reserving Judgment, we focus in on our favourite parts of Justice Mosley's Federal Court of Canada decision that found the invocation of the Emergencies Act was unreasonable and that some of the orders made under it were unconstitutional. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Federal Court of Canada decision on Em…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 21: Were police justified in secretly sampling 150 Kurdish people's DNA?
54:09
54:09
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
54:09
On Episode 21 of Not Reserving Judgment, Josh asks whether B.C. police conducted unreasonable searches when they set up an elaborate plot to catch a killer using samples of tea, Joanna updates us on South Africa's weak case against Israel, and Christine explains her concerns around the incitement to hatred charges laid against a man holding a terro…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 20: Why were police so slow to respond when Josh was threatened?
38:42
38:42
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
38:42
On Episode 20 of Not Reserving Judgment, Josh tells us about some thugs who threatened him and how police initially refused to help, and Christine explains why the Federal Court seems to have gotten it wrong by upholding the refusal of a Chinese student's study visa over espionage concerns. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Woman …
…
continue reading

1
Episode 19: Can a P.E.I. village force a councillor to resign for his sign?
46:54
46:54
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
46:54
On Episode 19 of Not Reserving Judgment, we tell you about the witch hunt against a Prince Edward Island village councillor who put up a controversial sign; we explain why the B.C. Supreme Court got it wrong by blocking a new law that bans hard drug use in places like parks; and we interview an expert on the Israeli Supreme Court's decision to bloc…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 18: Do anti-Israel activists have a right to protest in shopping malls?
49:36
49:36
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
49:36
On Episode 18 of Not Reserving Judgment, we explain why a new anti-pornography bill poses a risk to your rights; we examine the law on whether there's a right to protest in private spaces like shopping malls; and we discuss the sentence handed down for the man who defrauded the art world by creating fake Norval Morrisseaus. Stories and cases discus…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 17: Why is Uber suing the City of Toronto?
39:40
39:40
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
39:40
On Episode 17 of Not Reserving Judgment, we explain the problems with the concept of "Charter values," which has been reaffirmed in a case about language rights in Northwest Territories; we tell you about Uber's lawsuit against the City of Toronto; and we discuss the Ottawa airport's crazy decision to take down a Metis ad. Stories and cases discuss…
…
continue reading

1
Bonus Episode: Christine and Joanna discuss their new book 'Pandemic Panic'
30:52
30:52
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
30:52
In this bonus episode, the Hon. Tony Clement interviews Joanna and Christine about their best-selling book 'Pandemic Panic.' Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal chari…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 16: Is it racist to require teachers to pass math tests?
44:10
44:10
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
44:10
On Episode 16 of Not Reserving Judgment, we tell you about a Waterloo school board official who lost his bid to block teacher Carolyn Burjoski's defamation claim after he called her transphobic; we get into the discussion over Alberta's Sovereignty Act motion; and we tell you about an Ontario Court of Appeal decision that found requiring math tests…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 15: Should Alberta create new rights to refuse vaccines and harsh lockdowns?
48:35
48:35
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:35
On Episode 15 of Not Reserving Judgment, we talk about the Manning Report's recommendations to amend Alberta's laws to better protect rights in future emergencies; we applaud the Supreme Court for refusing to hear the appeal of four men stuck in Syria; and we explain why it was illegal for the federal government to ban single-use plastics like stra…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 14: Why haven't we seen more arrests for hate speech in Canada?
39:18
39:18
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
39:18
On Episode 14 of Not Reserving Judgment, we talk about why we haven't seen more hate speech charges following the explosion of vitriol at the past month's anti-Israel rallies; we discuss whether caste-based discrimination should be banned; we tell you about the curious case of a woman who says she was fired for calling her underlings "my humans"; w…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 13: Who is Trudeau's latest pick for the Supreme Court of Canada?
49:27
49:27
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
49:27
On Episode 13 of Not Reserving Judgment, we discuss a new Supreme Court decision that found some mandatory minimum sentences for child luring are cruel and unusual punishment; we tell you what we know about Justin Trudeau's latest Supreme Court pick, Justice Mary Moreau; and we talk about a series of human rights complaints that allege CUPE has dis…
…
continue reading

1
Episode 12: Was the Trudeau government's "assault weapons" ban legal?
56:08
56:08
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
56:08
On Episode 12 of Not Reserving Judgment, we walk you through a new federal court decision that upheld the Trudeau government’s so-called "military-style assault weapons ban"; we tell you about a new study that found vaccine passports did little to increase uptake of vaccines; and we discuss whether government officials violate free speech when they…
…
continue reading