Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
2:39:18
2:39:18
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
2:39:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
Trump v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Moyle v. U.S., No. 23-726 [Arg: 4.24.2024]
1:53:01
1:53:01
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:53:01
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the order by the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho enjoining the enforcement of Idaho’s Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother, on the ground that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act preempts it. ★ Support this pod…
…
continue reading
1
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, No. 23-367 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
52:18
52:18
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
52:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts must evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act using the traditional, stringent, four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or some other more lenient standard. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Department of State v. Muñoz, No. 23-334 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
1:31:26
1:31:26
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:31:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a consular officer's refusal of a visa to a U.S. citizen's noncitizen spouse impinges upon a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen; and whether, assuming that such a constitutional interest exists, notifying a visa applicant that he was deemed inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (A)(ii) suffices to provide…
…
continue reading
1
Smith v. Spizzirri, No. 22-1218 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
43:17
43:17
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
43:17
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, No. 23-175 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
2:25:58
2:25:58
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
2:25:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
Moyle v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Dept. of State v. MunozBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinneyBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Smith v. SpizzirriBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
City of Grants Pass v. JohnsonBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Thornell v. Jones, No. 22-982 [Arg: 4.17.2024]
1:04:36
1:04:36
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:04:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. Washington when it disregarded the district court’s factual and credibility findings and excluded evidence in aggravation and the state’s rebuttal when it reversed t…
…
continue reading
1
Fischer v. U.S., No. 23-5572 [Arg: 4.16.2024]
1:40:36
1:40:36
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:40:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio, No. 23-50 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
58:22
58:22
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
58:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, under which a malicious prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge even if other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause, or by the “any-crime” rule, under which probable cause…
…
continue reading
1
Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
1:38:39
1:38:39
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:38:39
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether section 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
Thornell v. JonesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Fischer v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Chiaverini v. City of NapoleonBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Snyder v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 23-146 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
53:43
53:43
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
53:43
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax. ★ Support this podcast on …
…
continue reading
1
Erlinger v. U.S., No. 23-370 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
1:33:07
1:33:07
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:33:07
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, No. 23-235 [Arg: 3.26.2024]
1:32:59
1:32:59
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:32:59
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 actions with respect to mifepristone’s approved conditions of use; whether the FDA’s 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious; and whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief. ★ Support this p…
…
continue reading
Connelly v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Erlinger v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine
1:19:50
1:19:50
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:19:50
FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic MedicineBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Harrow v. Department of Defense, No. 23-21 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
50:40
50:40
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
50:40
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the 60-day deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) for a federal employee to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
1:26:29
1:26:29
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:26:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
Harrow v. Dept. of DefenseBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Becerra, Sec. of H&HS v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
1:14:15
1:14:15
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:14:15
Becerra, Sec. of H&HS v. San Carlos Apache TribeBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, No. 22O141 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:08:41
1:08:41
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:08:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court should deny the motion by Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado for entry of a proposed consent decree that would resolve this dispute over the United States' claim as intervenors that New Mexico violated the Rio Grande Compact without the United States’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 22-1025 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:25:45
1:25:45
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:25:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves v. Barlett can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened; and (2) whether Nieves is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024]
1:12:12
1:12:12
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:12:12
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Diaz v. U.S., No. 23-14 [Arg: 3.19.2024]
1:24:56
1:24:56
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:24:56
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether in a prosecution for drug trafficking — where an element of the offense is that the defendant knew she was carrying illegal drugs — Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) permits a governmental expert witness to testify that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not entrust large …
…
continue reading
1
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
1:14:26
1:14:26
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:14:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment allows a government regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of (a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a perceived “general backlash” against the speaker’s advocacy. ★ Suppo…
…
continue reading
1
Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
1:42:32
1:42:32
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:42:32
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper. ★ Support …
…
continue reading
1
Coinbase v. Suski, No. 23-3 [Arg: 2.28.2024]
42:57
42:57
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
42:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, where parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, an arbitrator or a court should decide whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976 [Arg: 2.28.2024]
1:30:26
1:30:26
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:30:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a machinegun, i.e., into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot ... by a single function of the trigger.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Cantero v. Bank of America, No. 22-529 [Arg: 2.27.2024]
1:47:46
1:47:46
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:47:46
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state escrow-interest laws to national banks. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
McIntosh v. U.S., No. 22-7386 [Arg: 2.27.2024]
48:57
48:57
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
48:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a district court may enter a criminal-forfeiture order outside the time limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, No. 22-555 [Arg: 2.26.2024]
1:20:06
1:20:06
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:20:06
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment prohibits viewpoint-, content-, or speaker-based laws restricting select websites from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech ‚Äî or otherwise burdening those editorial choices through onerous operational and disclosure requirements. ★ Support this podc…
…
continue reading
1
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, No. 22-277 [Arg: 2.26.2024]
2:22:31
2:22:31
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
2:22:31
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the laws content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment; and (2) whether the laws‚Äô individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]
53:20
53:20
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
53:20
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the discovery accrual rule applied by the circuit courts and the Copyright Act‚Äôs statute of limitations for civil actions, 17 U.S.C. ¬ß 507(b), a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23A349 [Arg: 2.21.2024]
1:29:06
1:29:06
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:29:06
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency‚Äôs federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, No. 23-51 [Arg: 2.20.2024]
1:00:19
1:00:19
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:00:19
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation must also be employed by a company in the transportation industry. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Bởi Austin Songer
…
continue reading
Gonzalez v. TrevinoBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Diaz v. United StatesBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc.
1:01:59
1:01:59
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:01:59
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc.Bởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
NRA v. VulloBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Murthy, Surgeon Gen. v. Missouri
1:28:02
1:28:02
Nghe Sau
Nghe Sau
Danh sách
Thích
Đã thích
1:28:02
Murthy, Surgeon Gen. v. MissouriBởi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading