SCOTUScast podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

73 subscribers

Ajouté il y a six ans

Nội dung được cung cấp bởi The Federalist Society. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được The Federalist Society hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

All About Change

1
Chris Nowinski - Protecting Athletes from Head Injuries & Preventing CTE 27:28

cách đây 9 ngày trước27:28

Nghe Sau

Danh sách

Thích

Đã thích

27:28

Chris Nowinski is a former football player at Harvard University and professional wrestler with WWE, World Wrestling Entertainment. After enduring a career-ending head injury, Chris has dedicated his professional life to serving patients and families affected by brain trauma, particularly Chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a progressive neurodegenerative disease that develops after repeated head injuries. Jay and Chris discuss the state of head injuries in American athletics, the difference between advocating for head safety at youth and professional levels, Chris’ newest research, and much more. Episode Chapters (00:00) Intro (00:50) changes in the culture around concussions in the past two decades (02:39) padded helmet technology (03:55) concussion reporting in the NFL (10:35) Chris’ career path and concussion history (14:52) connecting with activists who haven’t themselves suffered a traumatic brain injury (17:42) SHAAKE - a new sign to identify concussions (20:53) Unions can help players advocate for safety policies (23:10) final thoughts and goodbye For video episodes, watch on www.youtube.com/@therudermanfamilyfoundation Stay in touch: X: @JayRuderman | @RudermanFdn LinkedIn: Jay Ruderman | Ruderman Family Foundation Instagram: All About Change Podcast | Ruderman Family Foundation To learn more about the podcast, visit https://allaboutchangepodcast.com/…

SCOTUScast

Chia sẻ

Trang chủ series•Feed

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast

625 tập

#Politics #Law #Supreme Court #News #Business #Business Disciplines #Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

73 subscribers

updated cách đây khoảng một năm trước

Chia sẻ

Trang chủ series•Feed

625 tập

#Politics #Law #Supreme Court #News #Business #Business Disciplines #Federalist Society

Tất cả các tập

1
SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 16:50

cách đây 27 weeks trước16:50

16:50

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 6-3 opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy. The Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial. Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications. Featuring: Devin Watkins, Attorney, Competitive Enterprise Institute…

1
Murthy v. Missouri - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 31:04

cách đây 27 weeks trước31:04

31:04

On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court issued their opinion in Murthy v. Missouri. Originally filed as Missouri v. Biden, this case concerns whether federal government officials violated five individuals’ freedom of speech by “coercing” or “significantly encouraging” social media companies to remove or demote particular content from their platforms. Experts discuss and react to this 6-3 ruling. Featuring: Moderator: Brent Skorup, Legal Fellow, Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Insitute Speakers: Corbin K. Barthold, Internet Policy Counsel and Director of Appellate Litigation Josh Divine, Solicitor General, Missouri Attorney General's Office Jenin Younes, Litigation Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance…

1
FDA v. AHM - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 23:36

cách đây 29 weeks trước23:36

23:36

On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine holding that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory actions regarding mifepristone. Join us to hear our panel break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Adam Unikowsky, Partner, Jenner & Block LLP Megan M. Wold, Partner, Cooper & Kirk (Moderator) Prof. Teresa Stanton Collett, Professor and Director, Prolife Center, University of St. Thomas School of Law…

1
Loper Bright & Relentless - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 23:02

cách đây 30 weeks trước23:02

23:02

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its 6-2 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and its 6-3 decision in Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce. These decisions overturning Chevron v. NRDC (1984) may notably change the nature of the administrative state and the role of judges in reviewing agency actions moving forward. Join us as we will discuss and break down the decision and the potential future impacts of this sea change in administrative law. Featuring: Prof. Ronald M. Levin, William R. Orthwein Distinguished Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis School of Law John J. Vecchione, Senior Litigation Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance (Moderator) Prof. Kristin E. Hickman, Distinguished McKnight University Professor and Harlan Albert Rogers Professor in Law, University of Minnesota Law School…

1
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 10:00

cách đây 41 weeks trước10:00

10:00

On March 19, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre. At issue was whether or not the government failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that respondent's removal from the government’s No Fly List mooted his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. Join us to hear Joseph Davis break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Mr. Joseph Davis, Legal Counsel, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty…

1
Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 16:33

cách đây 41 weeks trước16:33

16:33

On May 23, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski. At issue was whether a court or an arbitrator must decide which contract governs where parties have agreed to two contracts — one sending arbitrability disputes to arbitration, and the other either explicitly or implicitly sending arbitrability disputes to the courts. Join us to hear Professor Tamar Meshel break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications Featuring: Prof. Tamar Meshel, Associate Professor, University of Alberta Faculty of Law…

1
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 15:28

cách đây 44 weeks trước15:28

15:28

On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC. At issue was whether choice-of-law provisions in maritime contracts are presumptively enforceable under federal maritime law. Join us to hear Professor Andrew Hessick break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Prof. Andrew Hessick, Judge John J. Parker Distinguished Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Strategy & Planning, University of North Carolina School of Law…

1
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 15:54

cách đây 44 weeks trước15:54

15:54

On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri. At issue was whether an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant. Join us to hear Alison Somin break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Mrs. Alison Somin, Legal Fellow, Center for the Separation of Powers, Pacific Legal Foundation…

1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 15:27

cách đây 45 weeks trước15:27

15:27

On April 12, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC. At issue was whether a transportation worker need not work in the transportation industry to be exempt from coverage under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act. Join us to hear Professor Samuel Estreicher break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Prof. Samuel Estreicher, Dwight D. Opperman Professor of Law and Director, Center for Labor, New York University School of Law…

1
Trump v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast 27:15

cách đây 45 weeks trước27:15

27:15

On April 25, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. United States. The Court considered whether, and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. Please join us as we break down and analyze how oral argument went before the Court. Featuring: Mr. Steven Bradbury, Distinguished Fellow, The Heritage Foundation…

1
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 23:19

cách đây 45 weeks trước23:19

23:19

On April 12, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California. At issue was whether a building-permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as applied in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. Join us to hear Nancie Marzulla and Jayson Parsons break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Ms. Nancie Marzulla, Partner, Marzulla Law Mr. Jayson Parsons, Associate, Rutan & Tucker LLP…

1
Devillier v. Texas - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 17:51

cách đây 45 weeks trước17:51

17:51

On April 16th, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Devillier v. Texas. At issue was whether owners of property north of U. S. Interstate Highway 10 adversely affected by the flood evacuation barrier constructed by Texas should be permitted on remand to pursue their takings clause claims through the cause of action available under Texas law. Join us to hear Prof. Ilya Somin break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Prof. Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School and B. Kenneth Simon Chair in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute…

1
McIntosh v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 17:35

cách đây 46 weeks trước17:35

17:35

On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in McIntosh v. United States. At issue was whether a district court’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2)(B)’s requirement to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing bars a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing subject to harmless-error principles on appellate review. Join us to hear Stefan Cassella break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications. Featuring: Mr. Stefan Cassella, CEO, Asset Forfeiture Law, LLC…

1
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P. - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 12:47

cách đây 46 weeks trước12:47

12:47

On April 12, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P. At issue was whether U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit erred in holding that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K can support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement. Join us to hear Prof. Adam Pritchard break down the decision and its potential ramifications. Featuring: Prof. Adam Pritchard, Frances and George Skestos Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School…

1
Pulsifer v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 17:53

cách đây 50 weeks trước17:53

17:53

On March 15, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Pulsifer v. United States. The Supreme Court considered an Eighth Circuit case that raised the question: "Must a defendant show he does not meet any of the criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) to qualify for a sentence lower than the statutory minimum?" At issue was the meaning of the word "and" in the statute, and whether text and context required "and" in this case be read as "and" to mean "or". Join us to hear Vikrant Reddy break down the decision and offer his criticism of the Court's reasoning and ruling. Featuring: Mr. Vikrant Reddy, Senior Fellow, Stand Together Trust…

Chào mừng bạn đến với Player FM!

Player FM đang quét trang web để tìm các podcast chất lượng cao cho bạn thưởng thức ngay bây giờ. Đây là ứng dụng podcast tốt nhất và hoạt động trên Android, iPhone và web. Đăng ký để đồng bộ các theo dõi trên tất cả thiết bị.