The Downfall Of Diddy: Diddy And The Reply Brief Filed With The Appeals Court (Part 2) (10/28/24)

Beyond The Horizon

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.
Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.
(commercial at 7:42)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
source:
gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf