Chia sẻ
))
Each week The Intercept’s Washington, D.C. bureau brings you one important or overlooked story from the political world. Bureau Chief Ryan Grim and a rotating cast of journalists, politicians, academics and historians tell you what the rest of the media are missing. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
…
continue reading
Dissent Episode Four: The Right to Discriminate
Manage episode 354802982 series 1342681
Nội dung được cung cấp bởi The Intercept / Panoply and The Intercept. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp bởi The Intercept / Panoply and The Intercept hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ. Nếu bạn tin rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không được phép, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu tại đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.
Back in 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a case involving a cake shop owner who refused to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. In a 7-2 decision, the court found that the state had violated the cake maker’s religious objections. Now the court is considering another case out of Colorado that could expand the right to discriminate under the guise of free speech. In the fourth episode of Dissent, Jordan Smith and law professor Hila Keren discuss 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, a challenge to the state’s Anti-Discrimination Act brought by Lorie Smith, a website designer seeking to refuse wedding design services to same-sex couples. Unlike Masterpiece Cakeshop, the 303 Creative case has no injured parties; it is a preemptive attempt to allow businesses to practice unfettered discrimination.
If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/join — your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
273 tập
