Artwork

Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Anthony Pompliano. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Anthony Pompliano hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Ứng dụng Podcast
Chuyển sang chế độ ngoại tuyến với ứng dụng Player FM !

Crypto Is Being Politicized Which Should Not Be Surprising

5:33
 
Chia sẻ
 

Manage episode 418032763 series 2508895
Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Anthony Pompliano. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Anthony Pompliano hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

Today’s letter is brought to you by Consensus 2024!

Consensus 2024 is happening May 29-31 in Austin, Texas. This year marks the tenth annual Consensus, making it the largest and longest-running event dedicated to all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3.

Don’t miss Bitcoin: We Are So Back, where Anthony Pompliano will discuss what the next bull market will look like, how it will differ from previous run-ups and the broad macro investment thesis for bitcoin and crypto more broadly.

Consensus has tailored programming for Bitcoin maxis and multi-chain mavericks alike, covering everything from post-halving strategies to mining and more.

Plus, you absolutely won’t want to miss the epic BTC (Nic Carter) vs ETH (David Hoffman) battle at Karate Combat.

That’s just a taste of what's to come at crypto’s only big-tent event. Join Consensus in Austin alongside 15,000+ investors, founders, brands and more to take in all that blockchain has to offer. Get your pass today and use code POMP to save 20%.

To investors,

The bitcoin and crypto industry has finally become big enough to enter the political arena. In the last week, we saw President Biden and his administration continue their war path against the growing industry. Within days, President Trump held an event where he not only came out in strong support of crypto, but featured a number of crypto speakers as well.

The politicians are picking sides.

It appears that the left sees their abrasive stance against bitcoin and crypto as something that will have no negative repercussions. The right appears to believe that embracing the new technology could help them gain voters in November.

Regardless of what side you are on, this is a fascinating development.

I thought it may be helpful to share the commentary from a few folks related to these political decisions. First, here is Castle Island’s Nic Carter:

“I’d love to live in the fantasy blank slate world many of your dwell in where new technologies have no partisan mapping and politicians just choose positions tabula rasa but that’s not our world.

Crypto is inherently political and has always been; to the extent leftism relies on the politicization of finance, crypto will be a rightist technology, definitionally. It is delusional to meekly intone that crypto is nonpartisan and hope for the best. This will not be persuasive to leftists whose agenda is threatened by open finance.

It is suicidal not to align yourself with the faction that actively supports your cause”

Balaji Srinivasan followed Nic’s comments with the following statement:

“Crypto is for American conservatives and Chinese liberals. It’s for small countries and dispossessed minorities. Because it gives power to those without state power. Democrats and Communists control powerful states, so they don’t benefit from crypto. But everyone else does.

So I agree with Nic’s point but with one major qualifier: crypto is to the right of American Democrats and to the left of Chinese Communists. In other words, it’s in the global center.”

Unchained’s Laura Shin shared this:

“Gensler and Warren are trying to politicize crypto. If the industry falls into the trap and takes the bait and does the same, then, game over — they win.

If crypto becomes politicized, then automatically 40+% of Americans will be against it without ever really learning about it.

IMO, if the industry focuses on education and explaining what crypto is and why it isn’t and shouldn’t be a political issue, then as the tech becomes more developed and used, there will gradually be more acceptance and adoption without having to overcome the hurdle of it having been politicized.

Take it, leave it, this is just my perspective”

These comments came after massive blowback for an op-ed that was written in Blockworks by Molly Jane Zuckerman titled “Only a fool would vote on crypto alone.”

In the piece, Molly writes:

“What I see is a small number of wealthy individuals, who made that wealth from cryptocurrency, looking for the government to let them continue growing that wealth unfettered.

Among diehard crypto evangelists right now, “voting for crypto” means voting Republican for president. According to this side of the debate, any other decision will virtually assure the death of the American crypto industry.

This fear (true or not) has led some major personalities in Web3 to push crypto supporters into becoming single-issue voters. Their message is clear: Choose your 2024 candidates based solely on their cryptocurrency stance, or else.

In other words, Americans should prioritize their own selfish financial interests over broader societal and ethical concerns. When you promote the idea of voting for America’s crypto industry above all else, you’re deciding to ignore all of the other issues that are really at stake this election season — healthcare access, Social Security, gun legislation, women’s rights, LGBT issues, immigration, to name a few.

I want to be clear — I do not care if you vote Republican, Democrat, or third-party, as long as you care about the issues at stake, and truly believe that the candidate in question is representative of your views. But voting for a candidate you would not otherwise support, simply because they favor the deregulation of a sector in which you hold a profit motive, is a compromise that you should not make.”

Obviously politics has been a controversial subject at any point in history. Add in the tribalism of crypto and you have a cocktail for chaos on the internet.

There seemed to be one thing missing in the conversation all weekend long though…people have been voting for their wallets for decades.

This is not new.

The current president has the lowest approval rating in American history. A big part of that is because majority of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck and inflation is more than 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2% annually.

There are many topics and positions to consider when voting for a candidate, but if you can’t afford to live a relatively normal lifestyle in America then people are going to seek out ways to change leadership.

Bitcoin and crypto are presented as new things. They are from a technology standpoint. But the idea that people are suddenly going to use different criteria to vote doesn’t make any sense to me.

Citizens vote for who will put them in a better economic position. This is why you see incumbent presidents trying to implement various changes during election years, regardless of how bad of an idea the changes are.

Many of you know that I believe the free market is the single greatest referee in the world. This is true in economics, but also true in politics.

Just as the economy and market should be allowed to operate without intervention, the political process should be left untouched. Screaming at people because you don’t like their voting inclination is about as helpful as screaming at a wall.

Everyone’s time is better spent on more productive things. Hopefully this will be the last time I will have to write about crypto and politics before the November election.

Have a great start to your week. I’ll talk to everyone tomorrow.

-Anthony Pompliano

Reader Note: Today is a free email available to everyone. If you would like to receive these letters each morning, please subscribe to become a paying member of The Pomp Letter by clicking here.

Jihan Bowes-Little is the Co-Founder & Managing Partner at Bracket Capital, an investment firm focused on special situation opportunities in growth / late-stage private companies.

In this conversation, we talk about the similarities and differences investing in Coinbase, SpaceX, Stripe, landscape of private markets, financialization of venture capital, investing trends & sectors, cross-over investment example, market liquidity, bitcoin, and more. ⁠

Listen on iTunes: Click here

Listen on Spotify: Click here

Bracket Capital’s Jihan Bowes-Little on Coinbase, SpaceX, Stripe, Bitcoin, and more

Podcast Sponsors

* Core Scientific is one of the largest public Bitcoin miners and hosting solutions providers for Bitcoin mining in North America.

* iTrustCapital allows you to buy and sell cryptocurrency in a tax-advantaged crypto IRA.

* Supra - Join Supra’s early integration program for zero-cost access to the fastest oracles and dVRF across 50+ blockchains.

* Propy - Now, anyone can start their on-chain journey by minting home addresses via PropyKeys and staking them for profit until they are ready to sell their home.

* ResiClub - Your data-driven gateway to the US housing market.

* Bay Area Times - A visual newsletter explaining the latest tech & business news.

You are receiving The Pomp Letter because you either signed up or you attended one of the events that I spoke at. Feel free to unsubscribe if you aren’t finding this valuable. Nothing in this email is intended to serve as financial advice. Do your own research.


This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pomp.substack.com/subscribe
  continue reading

362 tập

Artwork
iconChia sẻ
 
Manage episode 418032763 series 2508895
Nội dung được cung cấp bởi Anthony Pompliano. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được Anthony Pompliano hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

Today’s letter is brought to you by Consensus 2024!

Consensus 2024 is happening May 29-31 in Austin, Texas. This year marks the tenth annual Consensus, making it the largest and longest-running event dedicated to all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3.

Don’t miss Bitcoin: We Are So Back, where Anthony Pompliano will discuss what the next bull market will look like, how it will differ from previous run-ups and the broad macro investment thesis for bitcoin and crypto more broadly.

Consensus has tailored programming for Bitcoin maxis and multi-chain mavericks alike, covering everything from post-halving strategies to mining and more.

Plus, you absolutely won’t want to miss the epic BTC (Nic Carter) vs ETH (David Hoffman) battle at Karate Combat.

That’s just a taste of what's to come at crypto’s only big-tent event. Join Consensus in Austin alongside 15,000+ investors, founders, brands and more to take in all that blockchain has to offer. Get your pass today and use code POMP to save 20%.

To investors,

The bitcoin and crypto industry has finally become big enough to enter the political arena. In the last week, we saw President Biden and his administration continue their war path against the growing industry. Within days, President Trump held an event where he not only came out in strong support of crypto, but featured a number of crypto speakers as well.

The politicians are picking sides.

It appears that the left sees their abrasive stance against bitcoin and crypto as something that will have no negative repercussions. The right appears to believe that embracing the new technology could help them gain voters in November.

Regardless of what side you are on, this is a fascinating development.

I thought it may be helpful to share the commentary from a few folks related to these political decisions. First, here is Castle Island’s Nic Carter:

“I’d love to live in the fantasy blank slate world many of your dwell in where new technologies have no partisan mapping and politicians just choose positions tabula rasa but that’s not our world.

Crypto is inherently political and has always been; to the extent leftism relies on the politicization of finance, crypto will be a rightist technology, definitionally. It is delusional to meekly intone that crypto is nonpartisan and hope for the best. This will not be persuasive to leftists whose agenda is threatened by open finance.

It is suicidal not to align yourself with the faction that actively supports your cause”

Balaji Srinivasan followed Nic’s comments with the following statement:

“Crypto is for American conservatives and Chinese liberals. It’s for small countries and dispossessed minorities. Because it gives power to those without state power. Democrats and Communists control powerful states, so they don’t benefit from crypto. But everyone else does.

So I agree with Nic’s point but with one major qualifier: crypto is to the right of American Democrats and to the left of Chinese Communists. In other words, it’s in the global center.”

Unchained’s Laura Shin shared this:

“Gensler and Warren are trying to politicize crypto. If the industry falls into the trap and takes the bait and does the same, then, game over — they win.

If crypto becomes politicized, then automatically 40+% of Americans will be against it without ever really learning about it.

IMO, if the industry focuses on education and explaining what crypto is and why it isn’t and shouldn’t be a political issue, then as the tech becomes more developed and used, there will gradually be more acceptance and adoption without having to overcome the hurdle of it having been politicized.

Take it, leave it, this is just my perspective”

These comments came after massive blowback for an op-ed that was written in Blockworks by Molly Jane Zuckerman titled “Only a fool would vote on crypto alone.”

In the piece, Molly writes:

“What I see is a small number of wealthy individuals, who made that wealth from cryptocurrency, looking for the government to let them continue growing that wealth unfettered.

Among diehard crypto evangelists right now, “voting for crypto” means voting Republican for president. According to this side of the debate, any other decision will virtually assure the death of the American crypto industry.

This fear (true or not) has led some major personalities in Web3 to push crypto supporters into becoming single-issue voters. Their message is clear: Choose your 2024 candidates based solely on their cryptocurrency stance, or else.

In other words, Americans should prioritize their own selfish financial interests over broader societal and ethical concerns. When you promote the idea of voting for America’s crypto industry above all else, you’re deciding to ignore all of the other issues that are really at stake this election season — healthcare access, Social Security, gun legislation, women’s rights, LGBT issues, immigration, to name a few.

I want to be clear — I do not care if you vote Republican, Democrat, or third-party, as long as you care about the issues at stake, and truly believe that the candidate in question is representative of your views. But voting for a candidate you would not otherwise support, simply because they favor the deregulation of a sector in which you hold a profit motive, is a compromise that you should not make.”

Obviously politics has been a controversial subject at any point in history. Add in the tribalism of crypto and you have a cocktail for chaos on the internet.

There seemed to be one thing missing in the conversation all weekend long though…people have been voting for their wallets for decades.

This is not new.

The current president has the lowest approval rating in American history. A big part of that is because majority of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck and inflation is more than 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2% annually.

There are many topics and positions to consider when voting for a candidate, but if you can’t afford to live a relatively normal lifestyle in America then people are going to seek out ways to change leadership.

Bitcoin and crypto are presented as new things. They are from a technology standpoint. But the idea that people are suddenly going to use different criteria to vote doesn’t make any sense to me.

Citizens vote for who will put them in a better economic position. This is why you see incumbent presidents trying to implement various changes during election years, regardless of how bad of an idea the changes are.

Many of you know that I believe the free market is the single greatest referee in the world. This is true in economics, but also true in politics.

Just as the economy and market should be allowed to operate without intervention, the political process should be left untouched. Screaming at people because you don’t like their voting inclination is about as helpful as screaming at a wall.

Everyone’s time is better spent on more productive things. Hopefully this will be the last time I will have to write about crypto and politics before the November election.

Have a great start to your week. I’ll talk to everyone tomorrow.

-Anthony Pompliano

Reader Note: Today is a free email available to everyone. If you would like to receive these letters each morning, please subscribe to become a paying member of The Pomp Letter by clicking here.

Jihan Bowes-Little is the Co-Founder & Managing Partner at Bracket Capital, an investment firm focused on special situation opportunities in growth / late-stage private companies.

In this conversation, we talk about the similarities and differences investing in Coinbase, SpaceX, Stripe, landscape of private markets, financialization of venture capital, investing trends & sectors, cross-over investment example, market liquidity, bitcoin, and more. ⁠

Listen on iTunes: Click here

Listen on Spotify: Click here

Bracket Capital’s Jihan Bowes-Little on Coinbase, SpaceX, Stripe, Bitcoin, and more

Podcast Sponsors

* Core Scientific is one of the largest public Bitcoin miners and hosting solutions providers for Bitcoin mining in North America.

* iTrustCapital allows you to buy and sell cryptocurrency in a tax-advantaged crypto IRA.

* Supra - Join Supra’s early integration program for zero-cost access to the fastest oracles and dVRF across 50+ blockchains.

* Propy - Now, anyone can start their on-chain journey by minting home addresses via PropyKeys and staking them for profit until they are ready to sell their home.

* ResiClub - Your data-driven gateway to the US housing market.

* Bay Area Times - A visual newsletter explaining the latest tech & business news.

You are receiving The Pomp Letter because you either signed up or you attended one of the events that I spoke at. Feel free to unsubscribe if you aren’t finding this valuable. Nothing in this email is intended to serve as financial advice. Do your own research.


This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pomp.substack.com/subscribe
  continue reading

362 tập

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Chào mừng bạn đến với Player FM!

Player FM đang quét trang web để tìm các podcast chất lượng cao cho bạn thưởng thức ngay bây giờ. Đây là ứng dụng podcast tốt nhất và hoạt động trên Android, iPhone và web. Đăng ký để đồng bộ các theo dõi trên tất cả thiết bị.

 

Hướng dẫn sử dụng nhanh