U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments podcast

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

Đã thêm cách đây bảy năm

Nội dung được cung cấp bởi U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments. Tất cả nội dung podcast bao gồm các tập, đồ họa và mô tả podcast đều được U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments hoặc đối tác nền tảng podcast của họ tải lên và cung cấp trực tiếp. Nếu bạn cho rằng ai đó đang sử dụng tác phẩm có bản quyền của bạn mà không có sự cho phép của bạn, bạn có thể làm theo quy trình được nêu ở đây https://vi.player.fm/legal.

The Agile Brand with Greg Kihlström®

1
#644: AI-augmented human recommendations for retail customers with Noah Zamansky, Stitch Fix 27:12

cách đây 9 ngày trước27:12

Nghe Sau

Danh sách

Thích

Đã thích

27:12

We are here at eTail Palm Springs and seeing and hearing the latest and greatest in e-commerce and retail. Question: Do you need to choose between AI and human recommendations as a customer? Why not have both? After all, don’t each have their strengths? AI in the retail experience is all the rage these days, but today I’m talking with someone from a brand that has been incorporating AI-personalized experiences and shopping combined with expert human recommendations for over 14 years, and continues to innovate today. Today we’re going to talk about how AI-based personalization plus human creativity and input makes an amazing customer experience at Stitch Fix. To help me discuss this topic, I’d like to welcome Noah Zamansky, Vice President of Product and Client Experience at Stitch Fix. About Noah Zamansky Noah Zamansky serves as the Vice President of Product and Client Experience at Stitch Fix, where he leads cross-functional teams spanning Product, Design, Engineering, Algorithms, and Platform Development. A seasoned leader, Noah has a proven track record of shaping product vision and strategy, designing exceptional user experiences, and spearheading the launch of new business ventures. Before joining Stitch Fix, Noah held the role of Senior Director of Product Management at eBay, overseeing Fashion and Vertical Experiences. Resources Stitch Fix: https://www.stitchfix.com eTail Palm Springs: https://etailwest.wbresearch.com/ Connect with Greg on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregkihlstrom Listen to The Agile Brand without the ads. Learn more here: https://bit.ly/3ymf7hd Don't miss a thing: get the latest episodes, sign up for our newsletter and more: https://www.theagilebrand.show Check out The Agile Brand Guide website with articles, insights, and Martechipedia, the wiki for marketing technology: https://www.agilebrandguide.com The Agile Brand podcast is brought to you by TEKsystems. Learn more here: https://www.teksystems.com/versionnextnow The Agile Brand is produced by Missing Link—a Latina-owned strategy-driven, creatively fueled production co-op. From ideation to creation, they craft human connections through intelligent, engaging and informative content. https://www.missinglink.company…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

Chia sẻ

Trang chủ series•Feed

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

71 tập

#Government #United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

updated cách đây 7 năm trước

Chia sẻ

Trang chủ series•Feed

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

71 tập

#Government #United States

Tất cả các tập

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Trump v. Hawaii 1:06:53

cách đây 7 years trước1:06:53

1:06:53

A case in which the Court held that President Donald Trump’s Proclamation restricting travel and immigration to the US from certain countries (“travel ban”) does not violate the president’s statutory authority or the Establishment Clause of the Constitution. The Court was also asked, but did not decide, whether a global injunction barring enforcement of parts of the Proclamation is impermissibly overbroad.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Abbott v. Perez 1:17:37

cách đây 7 years trước1:17:37

1:17:37

A case in which the Court decided that the district court erred in disregarding the presumption of good faith on the part of the Texas Legislature and improperly reversed the burden of proof in requiring the state to show a lack of discriminatory intent in adopting new districting plans; the Court also held that one of the state house districts at issue was an impermissible racial gerrymander.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. 1:00:32

cách đây 7 years trước1:00:32

1:00:32

A case in which the Court decided that a federal court determining foreign law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 should accord respectful consideration to a foreign government’s submission, but the court is not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government’s statements.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Chavez-Meza v. United States 58:36

cách đây 7 years trước58:36

58:36

A case in which the Court held that because the record in this case as a whole demonstrated that the judge had a reasoned basis for his decision, the judge’s explanation for reducing Adaucto Chavez-Meza’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to the middle instead of the bottom of the amended Federal Guidelines range was adequate.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Pereira v. Sessions 54:48

cách đây 7 years trước54:48

54:48

A case in which the Court held that a notice to appear for a removal hearing that does not specify the place and time of the hearing does not trigger the stop-time rule of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1), which gives the attorney general discretion to cancel removal for an alien who, among other criteria, has been continuously physically present in the country for at least ten years.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission 1:00:00

cách đây 7 years trước1:00:00

1:00:00

A case in which the Court decided that administrative law judges of the Securities and Exchange Commission are "officers of the United States" subject to the Constitution's Appointments Clause.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Washington v. United States 1:01:32

cách đây 7 years trước1:01:32

1:01:32

A case in which the Court was asked to decide, among other things, whether the state of Washington’s use of culverts to divert water violates its treaties with Indian tribes, and if so, whether the state must replace those culverts, at great cost.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lagos v. United States 57:56

cách đây 7 years trước57:56

57:56

A case in which the Court held that under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4), which pertains to reimbursement by defendants to victims for expenses incurred during the investigation or prosecution related to the offense, the words “investigation” and “proceedings” encompass only government investigations and criminal proceedings and do not include private investigations and civil or bankruptcy proceedings.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. 1:00:10

cách đây 7 years trước1:00:10

1:00:10

A case in which the Court overruled Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois, holding that states may require sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales tax for goods sold within the state.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling 57:27

cách đây 7 years trước57:27

57:27

A case in which the Court decided that a statement regarding a specific asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition” under section 523(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States 49:17

cách đây 7 years trước49:17

49:17

A case in which the Court decided that employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act because they are not “money remuneration.”

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. 1:01:23

cách đây 7 years trước1:01:23

1:01:23

A case in which the Court held that WesternGeco’s award for lost profits was a permissible domestic application of § 284 of the Patent Act.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Benisek v. Lamone 1:02:38

cách đây 7 years trước1:02:38

1:02:38

A case in which the Court upheld the federal district court's denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction by several Republican voters who alleged partisan gerrymandering in Maryland.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Koons v. United States 1:00:33

cách đây 7 years trước1:00:33

1:00:33

A case in which the Court decided that the petitioners, who were criminal defendants, were not eligible for sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because their sentences were not “based on” their lowered Federal Sentencing Guidelines ranges, but rather were “based on” the mandatory minimum sentences for their offenses and their substantial assistance to the government.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Hughes v. United States 52:24

cách đây 7 years trước52:24

52:24

A case in which the Court decided that a sentence imposed pursuant to a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) (“Type C”) plea bargain is “based on” the defendant’s Federal Sentencing Guidelines range as long as that range was a component of the framework the court used in imposing the sentence or accepting the plea bargain, meaning that in this case, Erik Hughes could seek a sentencing reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).…

Chào mừng bạn đến với Player FM!

Player FM đang quét trang web để tìm các podcast chất lượng cao cho bạn thưởng thức ngay bây giờ. Đây là ứng dụng podcast tốt nhất và hoạt động trên Android, iPhone và web. Đăng ký để đồng bộ các theo dõi trên tất cả thiết bị.

Nghe hơn 500 chủ đề

Tương tự như U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Mighty Patch™ Original patch from Hero Cosmetics - Hydrocolloid Acne Pimple Patch for Covering Zits and Blemishes in Face and Skin, Vegan-friendly and Not Tested on Animals (36 Count)

Amazon Basics Dog and Puppy Pee Pads with Leak-Proof Quick-Dry Design for Potty Training, Standard Absorbency, Regular Size, 22 x 22 Inches, Pack of 100, Blue & White

Podcast đáng để nghe

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

Podcast đáng để nghe

Chào mừng bạn đến với Player FM!

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

TERRO T300B Liquid Ant Killer, 12 Bait Stations

Amazon Basics Multipurpose Copy Printer Paper, 8.5 x 11 inches, 20 lb, 1 Ream, 500 Sheets, 92 Bright, White

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Tương tự như U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

Hướng dẫn sử dụng nhanh